2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | Escalade | SS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1900 mm |