2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1492 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Escalade | Puma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |