2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2002 Hummer H2
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Hummer H2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Hummer H2 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2002 Hummer H2. (316 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2002 Hummer H2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hummer H2 weights approximately 263 kg more than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Hummer H2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hummer H2 (522 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (515 Nm). This means 2002 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2002 Hummer H2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | Escalade | H2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 316 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 2903 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3130 mm |
