2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Escalade | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5996 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2380 mm |