2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Escalade | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5996 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 95 L |