2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Escalade | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 57 L |
