2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Acura TL. (305 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2012 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 891 kg more than 2012 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | Escalade | TL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 70 L |