2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 662 kg more than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo (489 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | Escalade | Gran Turismo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 489 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2646 kg | 1984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2056 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1353 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2942 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |