2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1211 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | Escalade | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 47 L |
