2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1871 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Smart |
| Model | Escalade | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 33 L |
