2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 1985 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2004 Cadillac SRX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1985 Caterham 1700. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1985 Caterham 1700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1417 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac SRX | 1985 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
| Model | SRX | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 83.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 543 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2240 mm |
