2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2004 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 490 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac SRX | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | SRX | F1 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |