2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2004 Cadillac SRX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 455 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac SRX | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | SRX | Condor |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2640 mm |