2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac SRX | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | SRX | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |