2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac SRX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac SRX. (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac SRX | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | SRX | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
