2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac SRX | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | SRX | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 342 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2916 mm |