2004 Cadillac SRX vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 917 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac SRX | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | SRX | 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2489 mm |
