2004 Cadillac XLR vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2004 Cadillac XLR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 740 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac XLR | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | XLR | XJR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 90 L |