2004 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 2004 Cadillac XLR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 65 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac XLR (408 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2004 Cadillac XLR has manual transmission. 2004 Cadillac XLR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: