2004 Cadillac XLR vs. 2006 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Ford Mustang. (300 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 75 kg more than 2004 Cadillac XLR.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac XLR. (408 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac XLR.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Cadillac XLR 2006 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model XLR Mustang
Year Released 2004 2006
Body Type Convertible Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4572 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 320 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 408 Nm 434 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1640 kg 1715 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 61 L