2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 430 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | FX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2620 mm |