2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1959 Holden FE

To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Holden FE weights approximately 440 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FE.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Caterham 7 1959 Holden FE
Make Caterham Holden
Model 7 FE
Year Released 2004 1959
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2261 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 60 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 5750 RPM 1200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 540 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 3310 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1150 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2230 mm 2670 mm