2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Caterham 7 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Caterham | Lotus |
Model | 7 | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2240 mm |