2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1962 Renault 4
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Renault 4 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1962 Renault 4 | |
Make | Caterham | Renault |
Model | 7 | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 603 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 546 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2410 mm |