2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1963 Simca 1000
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Simca 1000 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1963 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Caterham | Simca |
| Model | 7 | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 943 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2230 mm |
