2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 NSU Autonova weights approximately 265 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | Caterham | NSU |
Model | 7 | Autonova |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2260 mm |