2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Renault 8 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Caterham | Renault |
Model | 7 | 8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2280 mm |