2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1966 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1966 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Renault 8 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Renault 8. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Renault 8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1966 Renault 8 | |
Make | Caterham | Renault |
Model | 7 | 8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 130 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2280 mm |