2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1966 Rover P5
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 Rover P5. (122 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Rover P5. (217 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1966 Rover P5 | |
Make | Caterham | Rover |
Model | 7 | P5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2820 mm |