2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1967 DKW Munga
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 DKW Munga weights approximately 640 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1967 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Caterham | DKW |
| Model | 7 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2010 mm |
