2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1969 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1969 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Seat 600 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1969 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Caterham | Seat |
| Model | 7 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2010 mm |
