2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Torana weights approximately 390 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1972 Holden Torana | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Torana |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2440 mm |