2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 595 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | 7 | 160 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2680 mm |