2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1976 Dodge Aspen
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1976 Dodge Aspen. (101 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1976 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 995 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Dodge Aspen. (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1976 Dodge Aspen | |
Make | Caterham | Dodge |
Model | 7 | Aspen |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2760 mm |