2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 1030 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Caterham | Volvo |
Model | 7 | 265 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2660 mm |