2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1986 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 471 more horse power than 2004 Caterham 7. (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 Caterham 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1986 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Caterham | Jaguar |
| Model | 7 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 6499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 671 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2770 mm |
