2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1992 Volvo 480
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 480. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 480 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1992 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Caterham | Volvo |
Model | 7 | 480 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2510 mm |