2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 984 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 468 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2570 mm |