2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1998 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1998 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercury |
| Model | 7 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
