2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 738 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2004 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2004 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 7 | Equator |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3260 mm |
