2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 717 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2490 mm |