2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR weights approximately 530 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Caterham | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 7 | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2680 mm |
