2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 730 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (166 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Caterham | MG |
Model | 7 | TF |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2380 mm |