2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2004 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2004 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Caterham | Mitsubishi |
Model | 7 | eK |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2350 mm |