2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2004 Caterham 7. (251 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (258 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Caterham | Holden |
Model | 7 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |