2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 655 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.

Because 2010 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Caterham 7 2010 Mazda Tribute
Make Caterham Mazda
Model 7 Tribute
Year Released 2004 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 251 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 8000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 258 Nm 184 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 470 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 3110 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 810 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2230 mm 2630 mm