2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Caterham 7. (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Caterham | Dodge |
Model | 7 | Ram |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2900 mm |