2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (224 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Caterham | Saab |
Model | 7 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |