2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | 7 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
