2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP) has 172 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Caterham | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2449 mm |